April 3, 2005

• 蔡素玉沒有說錯
  

  蔡素玉在香港家書節目中說：
  

  There seems a cultural gap and emotional distance lying between him and the patriotic forces. While policies and official matters could more easily be forgotten and forgiven, personal style and relations, culture and emotions are not. He was viewed by some in the Pro-Beijing camp as arrogant and disrespecting of the patriotic values they cherished and treasured over the decades, and paid dear prices for. His elevation alienated quite a few in this camp.

  It is generally held that he enjoys a cultural intimacy with the democratic camp. It is uncertain how much that intimacy, can turn into political support and votes in the Legislative Council.

  ==============================================================================

  "Pro-Beijing camp"(簡單點說是「土共」)的"patriotic values"，反映在他們的行為上，包括：

  • 反英抗暴，炸死炸傷過百港人，燒死播音員林彬，最後主事人得到勳章。
  • 沒有國，哪有家，連想討論廿三條立法中有問題的細節也被指不配當中國人。
  • 建議把動植物公園中的英皇銅像放入猴子籠。
  • 公開罵陳日君主教「病態聖徒」。
  • 批評長毛說英文是殖民主義奴性作祟。
  • 得意洋洋地說把持反對意見的基本法草委開除，便可令基本法順利通過。

  與其說曾世凱遠離了這些"patriotic value"，倒不如說只有他們土共會擁抱這些"patriotic value"，他們的value跟社會主流的相距太遠，所以才會有03年七．一這個大頭佛。

  曾世凱所謂”enjoys a cultural intimacy with the democratic camp”，那不過是一些具有普世性的政治常識罷了，偏偏土共遠離了這些常識。

  蔡素玉也不過是在悶聲抗議幾句罷了，素玉呀素玉，其實不用太惱，曾世凱也不是真心擁抱這些普世價值的，他不過是說的好聽，最終還是會看北京頭行事的。

  • 6:24 am
  • 6 Comments