June 21, 2006

  • ª¾ÃѲ£Åv¸pªºµª«H

    Dear Mr X,

    Thank you for your enquiry.

    Please be informed that copyright can subsist in original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works; software program; sound recordings, films, broadcasts or cable programmes; and the typographical arrangement of published editions.  Copyright works made available on the internet environment are also protected.  Copyright is an automatic right.  It arises when a work is created and no registration is required in the Hong Kong SAR.  

    There are no formalities required to obtain copyright protection for a work in Hong Kong.  Works of authors from any place in the world, or works first published anywhere in the world, also quality for copyright protection in Hong Kong.

    When a person is illegally download, upload or distribute the copyrighted works without the permission of the copyright owner on  the internet, he or she is liable for civil or even criminal offence.  For penalties for criminal offences, you can also refer to Copyright Ordinance Cap 528 ( the Ordinances are available through the Department of Justice's Bilingual Law Information System (BLIS) on the Internet at http://www.justice.gov.hk/eng/home.htm) sections 118 & 119.

    For more information regarding Copyright in Hong Kong, please visit our website: http://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/faq/copyrights/cpr_amend.htm

    You can also refer to Copyright Ordinance Cap 528 Division II, especially in sections 22-25.

    As we do not give legal advice to the public, please do not rely on our above comments and the information in our website as legal advice. Since the Intellectual Property Laws of Hong Kong (including the Copyright Ordinance is a complicated piece of legislation), please consult your lawyer for professional advice.

    Best regards,

    Jenny Wong
    for Director of Intellectual Property

    ===================================================================

    ¬F©²µª«H¡A·íµM¬O¤j¥]³ò¡A©Ò¥H¥L­Ì¸ÑÄÀ¤F¡uª©Åv¡vªº¼s¸q·N«ä¡AµM«á§i¶D§Ú­Ì«I¥Çª©Åvªºªk«ß«áªG¡Aµª§¹¦¬¤u¡C

    ®Ú¾Úª©Åv±ø¨Ò²Ä22±ø(1)(f)¶µ¡G

    (1) §@«~ªºª©Åvªº¾Ö¦³¤H«ö·Ó¥»¤À³¡ªº¥H¤U±ø¤å¡A¨ã¦³¦b­»´ä§@¥X¥H¤U§@¬°ªº¿W¦³Åv§Q¢w
    (f) ±N¸Ó§@«~¼s¼½©Î±N¸Ó§@«~¥]¬A¦b¦³½u¶Ç¼½¸`¥ØªA°È¤º(°Ñ¾²Ä28±ø)

    ²Ä28±ø«ü¥X¡G

    ¼s¼½¦³Ãö§@«~©Î±N¨ä¥]¬A¦b¦³½u¶Ç¼½¸`¥ØªA°È¤º¡A¬O¨ü¥H¤U§@«~ªºª©Åv©Ò­­¨îªº§@¬°¢w
        (a) ¤å¾Ç§@«~¡BÀ¸¼@§@«~¡B­µ¼Ö§@«~©ÎÃÀ³N§@«~¡F
        (b) Án­µ¬ö¿ý©Î¼v¤ù¡F©Î
        (c) ¼s¼½©Î¦³½u¶Ç¼½¸`¥Ø¡C
    ®Ú¾Ú¤W­zªº(c)¶µ¡A¦]¬°pplive¬O¥Hp2p§Î¦¡¹B§@¡A§Y¬O©Ò¦³¨Ï¥ÎªÌ¦P®É¬O¤W¸ü©M¤U¸üªÌ¡A´«¥y¸Ü»¡¡A¬O¤W­zªº¡u¼s¼½¸`¥Ø¡vªº¦æ¬°¡C

    ¤£¹L¡A¸Ü»¡¦^¨Ó¡A¥¿¦p­»´äªºÂ½ª©¤é¥»AV¤@¼Ë¡A§Y¨Ï«IÅv¡Aª©Åv¾Ö¦³ªÌ¨S¦³°õ¦æ¨äªk«ßÅv§Q¡A¨S¦³¤H·|®»BT¤é¥»AVªº¤H¡C¦P¼Ë¦a¡AÃ@ªø²ö¤Î¡A¬Û«HCCTV-5¤£·|¦b­»´ä°õ¦æ¨äªk«ßÅv§Q¡C

    ªp¥B¡Applive¦ê¬yª½¼½¥@¬É¬×¤w¦b©x¤è·sµØºô¥X²{(°²³]³o¤£¬O°²ªº)    [¬ÛÃö¤å³¹]¡A¤¬¥y¸Ü»¡¡Applive¥Î¤á¤w¥i¹P¥¿¦¡¦Xªk´ë¹D¦¬¬Ý¡C§ó¥[¤£¦s¦bªk«ß°ÝÃD¤F¡C

    ©µ¦ù¾Åª¡G

Comments (4)

  • 網上版權

    永遠都是難搞D~

  • 我認為，CCTV5理論上是可以控告新華網侵權的。我看了CCTV5的直播，暫時看到的唯一合作伙伴是中移動（提供手機收看？），未見有和指定的網站合作。在內地很多大型節目都是有網站合作伙伴的，如果有的話都講得很清楚，然後該網站可以提供該節目的視頻片段或網上直播，如2006年超級女聲（http://ent.sina.com.cn/f/y/06supergirl/index.shtml）。但我看不到CCTV5世界杯和新華網有這樣的關係。

    當然，這一來是CCTV5沒有嚴打侵他們權的行為，事實上他們要打都先打一些未交錢就自下偷偷插播世界盃CCTV5畫面的地方電視台。二來新華網本身和CCTV關係就十分密切，因此雖不是同一家門的人，但看見對方侵自已權，也總不好意思興師問罪吧。但以此作為PPLive「合法」的論據，我認為是站不住腳的。

    還有最重要的一點，版權持有人不執行其法律權利，不代表就合法。兩個概念不應相混。

    港大法律系有一位教授是專門研究與網絡有關版權問題的，前陣子的「古惑天王」案中她提供了不少專業意見。如果真的有興趣可試試發個電郵問問她的看法。不過不知要不要收錢呢？;p

  • 鍚ㄩ扂脤賸斕枑鼎腔陔鋒窣磐ㄛ饒祥岆陔鋒腔☆?桴★ㄛ奧硐岆假閣吽腔☆煦桴★ㄛ?桴岆蚕陔扦假閣煦扦奪腔ㄛ俴淉奻睿陔鋒衄ㄛ扂砑控儔腔陔鋒?窒符祥奪饒嗣華源煦窒腔岈﹝籥?腔☆掛厙窒煦囀懂赻誑薊厙ㄛ衄ㄛ摯奀豢眳﹝★岆珨虳華源憩隴眭赻撩奧釬腔☆轎??隴★ㄗ祥綎岈?奻稛意?隴珨筒追汜鏍岈偍酏岆虴腔ㄘㄛ撈岆挲扂政婓賸ㄛ斕彆追政賸扂ㄛ斕湖???ㄛ扂憩彶忒ㄛ瘁扂憩?斕蘇偝賸﹝祥奪睡ㄛ眒桻課賸﹝

    鍚偌ㄩ假閣岆掀廌笭腔華源ㄛ扂艘綎珨虳鼎狟徭貉mp3麼?荌腔鋒桴ㄛ祥屾飲岆赻假閣腔﹝

  • 多謝chungpui提供的資料!

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment