March 16, 2012

  • 為何還有4成人"支持"梁振英?

     

    點評-那是掌門人節目嗎?

    關於那場辯論,有幾點觀察:

    1. 為什麼梁振英講一兩分鐘政綱也要幾秒看一次稿的?

    2. 梁振英的即時反應還可,但面對那些迫埋牆的問題,例如是否承諾要取消功能組別、六四等問題,其實還是失態。

    3. 唐英年與梁振英對戰的時候表現不算差,似乎他今次真的做足準備,把商台續牌問題和防暴隊問題搬出來講,是有一點爭soundbite的作用的。

    4. 何俊仁... well... 本來唐英年的表現已經太有喜劇感,可是何俊仁令整個辯論更像一場棟篤笑。這可不是說笑,真的好荒謬。可是,何俊仁這種表現,作為所謂的泛民代表,完完全全是映衰其黨及盟友。須知道,人們笑,可能是因為你幽默,也可能是你的表現真的好笑,唐和何都屬於後者,而何比唐更甚。

    5. 那個什麼「主場+舉手」做法,令辯論過程好像玩掌門人一樣,大家看上去好笑、在場市民又笑。整晚就好像一集綜藝節目。

     

    點解仲有4成? 

    臨訓之前,都係果句,點解個民調仍然係梁振英有四成?

    當然,以香港人既邏輯,佢地會諗既然中央只係俾唐梁去選,何就只係個花瓶,於是就會諗要二揀一。

    至於點解係揀梁?應該係覺得佢比較醒目掛。衰就真係衰在唐英年實在有太多笑料,令好多香港人不論中產定基層都覺得佢做唔掂,加上被認為是推太太出來見記者和有私生子,基本上女性都唔駛諗會揀佢。

    至於咩廿三條、地下黨員、六四、以縮短牌照有效期對付商台、鄧小平應該攞和平獎、城大被白色恐怖管治、黑社會介入選舉,呢D野太深?太嚴肅?定係已經唔再係大家覺得有所謂既野?總之梁振英醒目就得啦。

    白票?太激進了,又太「不負責任」了。負責任?講到好似你地3.25真係有份選咁。

     

    香港人仇「成功需苦幹」富二代

    不過,正經的說,或許香港人跟其他國家的人一樣,都不喜歡看上去像個loser的政客。加上香港人普遍其實心裡是討厭那班含著金鎖匙出世,但自以為是「成功需苦幹」的富二代。唐英年正正是這種形象的佼佼者。相反,他的對家雖然靠共產黨起家,但好歹也是白手興家,這方面真的高下立見。

    可是,現在的問題根本不是一定要二選一,大家以為只能二選一,而且不明白一個政治和法治問題上的鷹派,一個不折不扣的地下黨員,會如果全面加速香港的大陸化。其實無權無票的市民,根本是可以兩者都不要的,只要在民調中選「三者皆非」就可以。

    可惜,民調的時候說投白票實在超越很多人的認知。

     

    沒有票的,3.25出來柴台

    即使民調結果如此,不代表我們應該什麼也不做。3.25,我想不到半個不應該去會展柴台抗議的理由。我們應該柴台,是因為我們根本連用一人一票say yes or say no的權利也沒有;我們應該抗議,是因為香港整體社會就是被剝奪了選擇權,結果就是不是公子哥兒,就是地下共產黨員做特首!

    《東方日報》在3月16日吹風說政府在3.25會以「世貿級」警備防暴(特首投票日 世貿級警備 3.25全城防暴 - 東方日報)。那是一邊用來嚇那些可能會抗議的市民,另一邊是用來證明香港需要一個強硬的特首,那是給上面看的。其實為什麼一場「選舉」要出動防暴警察打仗一樣的嚴陣以待?那正正代表就算誰人上任都是不得民心,沒有民意授權(mandate)的。

    法不治眾,當日愈多人,警察就愈不敢亂來。如果我們能有夠多的人,那天就看看他們可以怎樣?而且,這段時間我們應該要求自稱代表泛民的選委不進場投票,作政治表態。

    讓我們把3.25那場不公義「選舉」推上國際新聞吧!

     

    選還選,查還是要查 

    還有,西九門一定要繼續查,涉嫌違反選舉法的社團飯局一定要查,地下宮殿一定要查,就算他們選到與否都要查下去,雖然很可能case在建制派議員和怕事官僚手上卒之都是什麼也查不出,但至少要有個交代,也要讓護短的政黨在9月選舉損失一點中間票也好。

    還有那個被某系統爆貪腐大鑊的曾蔭權,那些爆料很可能是某陣營用來分散公眾注意力的,但這段關鍵時刻,也理不得他那麼多了。過了3.25,繼續向他追究至無地自容,不能光彩落任為止。

     

    再講一次我的結論和呼籲:選,你冇得投,但請在3.25站出來,告訴全世界傳媒你唔要呢種假選舉,就好似當日大家告訴全世界D&G和海港城唔係大晒一樣。雖然廣東道的例子好像有點不一樣,但我們要的是那道同仇敵慨的氣!

     


    全港選民都應該問的問題。(圖片來源:馬來西亞民主行動黨網站)

     

    延伸收看、閱讀:

    1. 辯論錄影

     

    2. 《地下黨已經殺到身邊》(作者:前地下黨員梁慕嫻)http://www.open.com.hk/content.php?id=676

     

Comments (6)

  • Most of my facebook friends said Tong won the debate hands down.

  • Thanks for posting the youtube video, it helps me a lot. I did spent 90 minutes watching the debate. My first impressions are (1) Mainland China has a lot to learn from Hong Kong. I think the debate is fair and professional and allow voters to know the strength and weakness of the candidates better. It paves the road and gain confidence that HK people will be able to hold a democratic election. (2) i think Tang is better prepared of the three. He acts like, have the executive experience, and track record to maintain the prosperity of HK. Although, i am very disappointed with how handled his personal life, the other candidates were not successful to point out any major mistakes he made in public service. (3) i am concerned that Mr. Ho's party has only one goal in mind, that is voting by all. I agree that is very important. However, they did not give any idea whether they have the capabilty and knowknow to govern except to do survey and polls. Their constant attack on mainland can be counter productive. Their refusal to participate now to allow one of their party members to join the government cabinet is not wise. In US, we take a point to invite and allow opposition party members to join the cabinet. The idea is use the best talent to make the country or city-state should be the main goal of parties, i think. (4) i do not think that Mr. Leung deserve 40% support. Wonder where these numbers comes from? After watching the debate, i did not feel i can vote for him to govern HK. When audience asked him what achievements he has made to better HK. I was not impressed with his answer. When Tang attacked him, i felt the answer he gave was bordering on lies. He said, it is not on the official record. To me, that is a bs answer. I do not think that Tang or Leung are perfect candidates. In almost 99% of cases in the workd, there is no perfect candidates. Just look at USA for over 200 years of history. Most of the time, we just vote for less of two 'evils'. Somehow i come away not trusting on ability or honesty Mr, Leung on public matters which is more important in electing a governor. If i am forced to vote at this time, i lean towards Tang. But we still have time to make up our mind. Are there any other debates scheduled? Agsin thanks for posting.

  • Thanks, Kursk Sir, for uploading the video clip!  (Otherwise I would not be able to watch it.   )  

     

  • At least Henry TANG has shown us he has actually spent some efforts and time to prepare himself......  

     

     

  • TANG has *actually* impressed me by his answers and responses!!!  

    (Still watching, see if my impression will be changed soon~)
     

     

  • 一點分享:《梁振英踐踏香港核心價值的事例》:http://wp.me/p7SNz-J7

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment