February 23, 2008

  • 轉載: 阿Sir的自省

    阿Sir的自省

    [司徒華*] 2008年2月20日 [明報]

    (*明報犯了極低級錯誤,並竟然隔了一天才更正。作者應為吳志森)

    學生承認「羨慕陳冠希」,阿Sir閱後,無名火起,想立時抽出這個鹹濕而又坦白的同學責罵一番。但事緩則圓,不希望破壞討論氣氛,又要表現得開明開放虛懷若谷,只好暫時按下怒火。

    下課回家,完成工作已是深夜,累極卻未能入睡,再把文章拿出來,看了又看,竟然思潮起伏。

    同學指不少人都羨慕陳冠希,甚至封他做偶像,說出多少人的心裏話。窺探藝人私秘,無分年齡界別,無分職業階級,要不然,中環的達官貴人,不會長講不絕;要不然,八卦雜誌一出,不會馬上斷市,性照愈多愈露骨就愈好賣,買的未必是年輕人,因為他們都有辦法上網下載了全集,搶購的,多是「心智成熟」的成年人。

    藝員性照對阿Sir就一點吸引力都沒有?當然不是,阿Sir也有上網搜尋想一窺全豹,但因技術所限,無法找齊,但也不能跟同學一樣明目張膽互相傳閱,也不可在阿Sir之間陰陰笑交換欣賞。

    阿Sir承認也有看過,一個成年人,生理正常,當然有性需要,也有性幻想,但更多的卻是性壓抑。但在義正詞嚴的氛圍下,大家都對性避之唯恐不及,難道阿Sir可以直言不諱,跟所有人,包括同學們坦承相對嗎?

    學校當局嚴陣以待,想盡辦法要禁止性照在校園傳播氾濫,商討對策引導學生回到人生正軌。但性照事件,只是年輕同學的問題嗎?難道成年人就一點問題都沒有?道貌岸然的師長,一臉正氣的專家,長期壓抑的性觀念,雙重標準的性態度,不是都需要拿出來攤在陽光下檢討嗎?

    藝人被網民千夫所指,說謊虛假,公開是純情玉女,私下卻淫賤放蕩。網民一邊指摘藝人虛偽,自己卻一邊製造傳播假新聞,盡情搜羅性照、剝削別人的房中私隱以滿足一己私欲,邊看邊罵邊垂涎欲滴羨慕不已。說謊虛偽,比他們指摘的人,只有過之,而無不及。

    藝人圈子特別濫交隨便?在香港這個色慾都市,當你拿起第一塊石頭的時候,不會覺得心虛嗎?記住,一隻手指向別人,三隻手指會向自己。

    輾轉反側,徹夜難眠,不知不覺,已到天明。同學的坦白,拷問阿Sir的專業,詰難人們的良心。如果你是學校的阿Sir,你會真正反躬自省嗎?

     

Comments (17)

  • 一開始的時候(只出現三張照片的時候),在我的朋友圈中,羨慕陳冠希就是討論的最後結果。還打趣說要積怎樣的德才能有這樣的艷褔。

  • I have written down in my Xanga the feelings towards the disposition of my students to the incident on the Internet. On that day, the students of Student Association did a role play using the "speech" of Gillian Chung in the press conference to promote an activity during the morning line-up assembly. The junior form students laughed their guts out. I was very shocked to find that the attitude of the students was so shallow. This is not about whether I have seen the photos or not. Who do not have sin pick up a rock and throw it out? This is why the incident becomes a laughing stock? I knew that we had to do something. Many teachers of my school met together without informing the Principal. We discussed what we would do to facilitate the students to view the incident from different angles and to voice out their opinions. Of course, a series of activities like talk, class period, forum and such and such. We put the whole proposal on the desk of the Principal and said to him that we were going to actualise the proposal no matter what.

    My story does not end here. It is only the beginning. It is time for all of us to learn. Of course, the students should learn since obviously their parents have NOT done anything. (Perhaps it is Tuen Mun, a marginalised district.) But it is also time for us, the teachers, to learn how to talk to our students at the right moment. We cannot sit there all the time and follow our routine. How can we claim ourselves teachers then?

  • It's not only Tuen Mun - From a student in Tuen Mun.
    If you ever consider it is marginalised, you just internalising the marginalized others.

    We should notice that the whole thing, do entertains the public - we witnessed how artists entertain us through abnormal mean of providing an entertaining and educative news.

  • This issue worths our attention.

  • 其實自省, 也許是人生的歷練及體會的其中一個階段
    目的是使自己能不斷進步

  • 第時做教師,駛唔駛跟佢O既教學政策?

  • 同意同意!!!看的人比相中人更加虛偽.........

  • 所以中國人講「君子慎獨」!!!

    性,想也不該想

  • 道德從來是用來加諸他人
    制衡他人的武器
    這些本身就是武器的教條
    根本就違反道德原意

  • > 道貌岸然的師長,一臉正氣的專家,長期壓抑的性觀念,雙重標準的性態度,不是都需要拿出來攤在陽光下檢討嗎?

    說得不錯。
    但我倒有興趣知道,他怎樣看自己當年帶頭爭取訂立《不良刊物條例》(即《淫褻及不雅物品管制條例》前身)這件事。

    道貌岸然的師長、長期壓抑的性觀念……他有份塑造的。

  • @fongyun - 

    我自己覺得, 為人師表, 為了教育下一代理應拋棄對性的保守
    不正確或不肯面對教育性知識只會造成下一代對性這個題目有誤解

  • 這確是每一個有良知的人都應該有的反省。

  • 突然覺得華叔好型。

  • 其實這篇文並非出自華叔手筆,前幾天,明報副刊更正,指出錯作者名。

    忘了真正的作者是吳志森還是誰。

    華叔作品,完全不會有這種風格的,別忘了他是個70多歲的老人,沒那麼前衛的。

  • @ah_wood - 吓?!咁都錯得...

  • 那麼我的懷疑就完全合理了。

  • ...... 當然任何人對於任何東西/事件/觀念,都應該反省...... 

    Um,真的不像華叔的正氣、直接風格。

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment